Submitted by TRIBE

Remix Collection

TRIBE ran an influencer campaign for Swarovski's Remix Collection with 14 creator posts reaching a combined follower base of 1,317,967 at a 3.65% engagement rate.

Average CPE 0.06 $0.07 0.10average cost per engagement
Combined Followers 1,317,967combined followers
Creator Posts 14creator posts
Engagement 3.65%engagement rate
Likes & Comments 48,150likes and comments

Case in 60 seconds

Swarovski needed to introduce a new Remix Collection whose selling point was that its jewellery strands combine and recombine, which is a product property that a static product image cannot demonstrate on its own.

The campaign appears to turn on the reading that versatility is proved by being worn rather than claimed, because a strand system only becomes legible when a range of different people style the same four strands their own way.

Hand the same four jewellery strands to a set of creators and let each one build a personal styling of the Remix Collection, so the range is shown through the variety of the results rather than through a single brand execution.

TRIBE briefed creators to submit posts showcasing the versatility of Swarovski, gifting four jewellery strands each and asking creators to pitch what they would create along with their fee before TRIBE contacted the successful ones, producing 14 creator posts.

TRIBE reports 14 creator posts against combined followers of 1,317,967, an engagement rate of 3.65% and 48,150 likes and comments, with average CPE printed as 0.06, $0.07 and 0.10.

Strategy Breakdown

The primary strategy-learning section — interpretation, not a press-release summary.

Jewellery marketed on versatility has to prove that the same pieces read differently across different wearers, which a single brand-controlled execution cannot establish because it shows one styling decision rather than a range of them.
Swarovski supplied the four jewellery strands as gifted product and set the objective around self-expression, positioning the brand as the supplier of components while the styling decision sat with each creator.
Based on the available evidence, the sample comments on the page respond to the layered look and to the delicacy of the pieces rather than to the collection as a launch, which suggests audiences engaged with the styling on show rather than with the product news.

Creative & Execution System

Partners

  • TRIBE (lead_agency)

Participation mechanic

  • Creators applied to the brief by submitting what they would create along with their fee, and TRIBE contacted the successful applicants, so participation ran as a creator pitch rather than as a direct booking.

Results & Evidence

MetricValueResult type
average cost per engagementAverage CPE 0.06 $0.07 0.10engagements
combined followersCombined Followers 1,317,967performance
creator postsCreator Posts 14content_pieces
engagement rateEngagement 3.65%engagement_rate
likes and commentsLikes & Comments 48,150performance

Why TRIBE's strategy worked

  1. 1

    A product whose value is its configurability suits a multi-creator brief, because each creator's arrangement of the same components adds a demonstration the brand could not stage itself without appearing to enumerate options.

  2. 2

    Inviting creators to submit a concept and a fee before selection moves the casting decision onto proposed work rather than onto rate cards alone, which the page shows as the operating model for this campaign.

  3. 3

    Reporting engagement rate alongside a combined follower total suggests the campaign was judged on response density rather than on audience size, given that 48,150 likes and comments sit against 1,317,967 followers.

Related Case studies