
About the campaign
Butternut Box, a fresh dog food subscription service, needed to acquire new paying subscribers on TikTok rather than just passive viewers, while hitting a defined cost-per-acquisition target. Subscription dog food needs explaining, a fresh, hypoallergenic, direct-delivery model, and it asks owners to make a purchase commitment, so passive reach was never enough. The source describes no cultural tension, but the campaign traded on trust: pet owners are cautious about switching their dog's food, and a creator recommendation lowers that barrier more than an ad can.
House of Marketers built the campaign around a network of more than eight TikTok micro-influencers whose followings matched the dog-owning buyer profile. The creators published targeted content through their own accounts, communicating the delivery model and subscription offer to owners who were realistic prospects to convert. Matching creators to buyer profile did the targeting work, reaching likely subscribers rather than a broad pet-content audience, and the familiar-creator recommendation suited a considered purchase.
Creator audience trust was used as the conversion mechanism, and anchoring the work to a defined CPA target kept an influencer campaign accountable to acquisition economics rather than views. All activity ran on TikTok. Per the agency, the campaign generated 3.4M+ video views at a 13.4% engagement rate and beat its CPA target by 47%+, with the small network suggesting content resonance mattered more than creator count. Every figure comes from House of Marketers' own case study, with the CPA target, absolute subscriber numbers, spend, dates and market all undisclosed, so the efficiency claim cannot be sized or independently checked.
Case in 60 seconds
Butternut Box, a fresh dog food subscription service, needed to acquire new paying subscribers on TikTok, not just passive viewers, while hitting a defined cost-per-acquisition target.
Dog owners likely to convert respond to creators they already trust, so the subscription offer would land better through micro-influencers' existing audience relationships than through broad brand content.
Build the campaign around a network of 8+ TikTok micro-influencers whose credibility could carry the fresh, subscription-based dog food offer to dog-owning audiences.
The micro-influencers published targeted TikTok content aimed at dog owners likely to convert, communicating the delivery model and subscription offer through their own accounts.
Per the agency, the campaign generated 3.4M+ video views with a 13.4% engagement rate and beat its CPA target by 47%+. These figures are self-reported and not independently verified.
Strategy Breakdown
Creative & Execution System
Assets & channels
- TikTok creator videos published through the micro-influencers' own accounts
Partners
- House of Marketers
- 8+ TikTok micro-influencers
Participation mechanic
- Creator-published recommendation content; no audience participation mechanic is described in the source
Creator role
- Micro-influencers used their existing audience trust to communicate the fresh, subscription-based offer to dog owners likely to convert
Results & Evidence
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Video Views | 3.4M+ |
| Engagement Rate | 13.4% |
| Beat CPA Target | 47%+ |
Why House of Marketers' strategy worked
- 1
Matching creators to buyer profile did the targeting work: micro-influencers with dog-owning audiences reached prospects likely to convert rather than a broad pet-content audience.
- 2
Creator trust suited a considered purchase. A fresh food subscription asks owners to change what their dog eats, and a familiar creator's recommendation lowers that barrier more than brand-voiced advertising.
- 3
Anchoring the campaign to a defined CPA target kept an influencer campaign accountable to acquisition economics, not just views, and gave the 47%+ efficiency claim a concrete frame.
- 4
A small network (8+ micro-influencers) was reportedly enough to generate 3.4M+ views, suggesting content resonance mattered more than creator count.


